Factor Information
Data ID 1244
Factor Worse working memory
Description Of GMI subscale medians, CHD subjects had significantly worse memory performance vs. healthy control (verbal 88 vs.105, p<0.001; attention 88 vs. 109, p<0.001; working memory 86 vs. 108, p<0.001).
Biomarker NA
Classification F6 (psychosocial factor - other)
Association
Application prognosis
Objective to identify predictors of memory deficits in adolescents and young adults with CHD after surgical palliation compared to healthy controls.
p Value <0.001
Conclusion Adolescents and young adults with CHD, more than a decade since their last surgery, show significant verbal, attention, and working memory deficits over controls. To enhance patient memory/self-care, clinicians should explore ways to reduce anxiety, improve self-efficacy, and increase use of visual patient education material, especially in CHD males.
Risk Factor unknown
CHD Type
ID 506
CHD Type isolated CHD/non-isolated CHD
CHD Subtype ASD/VSD/PA/AS/CoA/MS/MR/EA/AVC/ALCAPA/D-TGA/Congenitally corrected TGA (s&p double switch)/TA/PA, IVS/SV
Reference
PMID 27843890
Year 2016
Title Predictors of Memory Deficits in Adolescents and Young Adults with Congenital Heart Disease Compared to Healthy Controls
Sample
Population Adolescents and Young Adults
Source questionnaires
Region Los Angeles, USA
Method logistic regression
Race North America
Disease History N/A
Treatment History Heart surgery
Group CHD(Treatment) healthy control(Control)
Number 80 80
Age Median age: 17 (14~21) years Median age: 18 (14~21) years
Gender (Male: Female) 42:38 42:38
Marker Level GMI subscale medians: 86 (55-122) GMI subscale medians: 108 (86-139)