| Factor Information | |
|---|---|
| Data ID | 2961 |
| Factor | correlation of MEE and World Health Organization |
| Description | There was a significant difference between MEE and the Schofield, World Health Organization and PICU-specific formula. |
| Biomarker | NA |
| Classification | Z (combined factor - combined factor) |
| Association | |
|---|---|
| Application | prognosis |
| Objective | compare resting energy expenditure in CHD children |
| p Value | 0.002 |
| Conclusion | There was a significant difference between MEE and the Schofield, World Health Organization and PICU-specific formula. |
| Risk Factor | unknown |
| CHD Type | |
|---|---|
| ID | 641 |
| CHD Type | isolated CHD/non-isolated CHD |
| CHD Subtype | ASD/AVSD/VSD, ASD/AC/TGA/TOF/VSD/PA, VSD/TOF, PA/TAPVC/PA, VSD/TOF, PDA, RAA/PDA, ASD, AC/DORV, VSD, ASD, PS/PA, VSD |
| Reference | |
|---|---|
| PMID | 20124946 |
| Year | 2010 |
| Title | Challenge of predicting resting energy expenditure in children undergoing surgery for congenital heart disease |
| Sample | ||
|---|---|---|
| Population | children and adolescent | |
| Source | patients' data | |
| Region | London, United Kindom | |
| Method | Bland Altman method | |
| Race | British | |
| Disease History | N/A | |
| Treatment History | surgery | |
| Group | children with CHD(Treatment) | N/A(Control) |
| Number | 21 | N/A |
| Age | 7.31±10.27 | 7.31±10.27 |
| Gender (Male: Female) | 17:4 | N/A |
| Marker Level | r2=0.253 | mean % difference=23.39(range of bias: -13.8-45.5) |
